Friday, December 31, 2021

W.3. Balance Point of the Blade

A properly balanced weapon offers significant advantages to the fencer who uses it.  Blade movement is faster and more responsive to the hand, with improved control and accuracy.  The place on the blade at which the weight of the inner, middle, and outer sections of the blade will equal the weight of the pommel, tang, grip, and guard is determined by the simple test of balancing the blade on a fulcrum, typically the index finger.  This is the balance point or the center of gravity.  The blade becomes more and more point heavy as the balance point moves toward the tip.  A similar but opposite weight shift occurs as the balance point moves toward the guard.  In the first case more work is required to move the blade and to control its trajectory.  In the second case, as weight moves to the guard, the lighter blade may become very difficult to control.

One might expect that balance would be considered a critical issue for the fencer.  It is relatively easy to alter the balance of the blade by changing the pommel and/or the grip.  However, less than half the fencing manuals sampled for this post addressed the balance point on the blade for foil and sabre.  Only the Italian sources for the spada provide a center of gravity that applies to the epee.  The following are the sources that addressed the balance point:    

1884:  Maestro Masaniello Parise specifies that the balance point of the spada should be 4 fingers from the guard in his treatise that became the standard for the Military Fencing Masters School at Rome.  The same center of gravity applies to the sabre.

1885: Giordano Rossi, a practitioner of the Radaellian School, specifies that the spada should balance in the double strong of the blade, approximately 4 fingers from the guard.  Similarly, he advocates that the sabre blade should balance at the same point, in the double strong 4 fingers from the guard.

1886:  Maestro Adelardo Sanz specifies that the balance point in sabre should be approximately 3 fingers from the guard.

1891:  Alfred Hutton, a prolific advocate for military training with the sword, describes the ideal balance point of the foil as being on the blade just above the guard.

1892:  Maitre Louis Rondelle suggests that a foil is correctly balance when the balance point is approximately 1 inch from the guard.

1904: Maestro Generoso Pavese, a graduate of the Military Fencing Masters School of Rome, places the foil balance point at 2.5 inches (4 fingers) from the guard.  The same measurement is used for sabre.

1905:  Professor Leopold Van Humbeek, a Belgian trained fencing master, taught an Italian based style of sabre fencing in the Netherlands.  He specified that the balance point on the blade should be a few centimeters from the guard.

1912:  Maestro Salvatore Pecoraro and Maestro Carlo Pessina suggest that two factors are key in the balance of the sabre: maximum ability to manage the blade which is achieved by the center of gravity being closest to the hand, and power in the blow which is achieved by the center of gravity being as far away from the hand as possible.  As a result they cite the range of balance points in various texts as being from four fingers from the guard to right against the guard.   They suggest 2 fingers from the guard as a reasonable compromise. 

1920: Maitre Ricardo Manrique, trained in the French School in Cuba, describes the foil balance point as approximately 1 inch from the guard.

1934: Maitre Felix Grave, a Master of the Academy of Arms and the Academy of the Epee of Paris, specifies that the balance point of the foil should be 15 millimeters from the guard. 

1936:  Maestro Luigi Barbasetti sets the balance point for the sabre as 5 centimeters (approximately 2 inches) from the guard.

1941:  The Breckenridges, father and son French School students of Maitre Francois Darrieulat, define the foil balance point as immediately in front of the guard so that with a #5 blade the weapon is slightly point heavy.

1948: Maitre d'Armes Clovis Deladrier, a Belgian trained master, uses different criteria for the balance of the foil.  In a normal guard position, the foil is properly balanced if the tip of the foil slowly lowers when all of the fingers except the index finger (which serves as a pivot point) are detached from the grip.  For epee, his primary focus about balance is on the impact of the off-center bell mounting on stability, not the relationship of the blade to balance.  For sabre, the test is similar to that of foil - when the last three fingers are released the tip will drop slowly.

As Maestri Pecoraro and Pessina remarked in 1912, the range of balance points runs from a maximum of 4 fingers to immediately in front of the guard.  Allowing for the fact that a "finger" is a measurement that will vary with the anatomy of the fencer, we are using Pavese's equivalent of 2.5 inches for 4 fingers, we can develop the data below.  We do not know whether the finger measurement is with or without a glove, but we assume it is without.  Note that it is important to use the inch or centimeter equivalents as increases in hand size over the years could push the balance point out into the point heavy range.

Range:  approximately 2.5 inches, approximately 6.35 centimeters - 4 fingers (Pavese's inch equivalent) to immediately close to the guard (we use a 0 centimeter value for this). 

Distribution (including both foil and sabre as the two are routinely describe as identical in the sample sources):

  • 4 fingers (approximately 2.5 inches, approximately 6.35 centimeters) - 6
  • 3 fingers (approximately 2 inches, approximately 5 centimeters) - 2
  • 2 fingers (approximately 1.25 inches, approximately 3.2 centimeters) - 1
  • 1 inch (approximately 2.5 centimeters) - 2
  • a few centimeters from the guard (an imprecise measurement, our assumption is that this is less than 1 inch or less than 2.5 centimeters - for calculations we assume that value as being 2 centimeters) - 1
  • 15 milimeters (1.5 centimeters) - 1
  • on the blade just above the guard (0 centimeters) - 2

Mean (average): approximately 3.99 centimeters or 1.57 inches or 2.5 fingers.

Mode (most frequently occurring value): 4 fingers from the guard (approximately 2.5 inches, approximately 6.35 centimeters).  This value may be skewed by the size and distribution of the sample in terms of French or Italian sources.

Sources:

Barbasetti, Luigi; The Art of the Sabre and the Epee; [fencing manual]; E. P. Dutton and Company, Inc., New York, New York, United States of America; 1937.

Breckenridge, Scott D. and Breckenridge, Scott D., Jr.; Sword Play: Based on the French School of the Foil; [fencing manual]; A. S. Barnes and Company, New York, New York, United States of America; 1941.

Deladrier, Clovis; Modern Fencing; [fencing manual]; United States Naval Institute, Annapolis, Maryland, United States of America; 1948.

Grave, Felix; Fencing Comprehensive; [fencing manual]; Hutchinson and Company, London, United Kingdom; 1934.

Hutton, Alfred; The Swordsman: A Manual of Fence for the Foil, Sabre, and Bayonet; [fencing manual]; H. Grevel & Company, London, United Kingdom; reprint by The Naval and Military Press, Uckfield, East Sussex, United Kingdom; 1891, reprint no date.

Manrique, Ricardo Enrique; Fencing Foil Class Work Illustrated; [fencing manual]; American Sports Publishing Company, New York, New York, United States of America, 1920.

Parise, Masaniello; Treatise on the Fencing of the Sword and Sabre; in The Roman-Neapolitan School of Fencing: The Collected Works of Masaniello Parise, Maestro di Scherma; translation by Christopher A. Holzman; [collected works]; Christopher A. Holzman, Wichita, Kansas, United States of America; 1884 reprinted as a collected work 2015.

Pavese, Generoso; Foil and Sabre Fencing (Scherma di Spada e Sciabola); [fencing manual]; Press of King Brothers, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America; 1905.

Pecoraro, Salvatore and Carlo Pessina; Sabre Fencing: A Theoretical-Practical Treatise; translation by Christopher A. Holzman; [fencing manual]; Christopher A. Holzman, Wichita, Kansas, United States of America; 1912 reprinted 2016.

Rondelle, Louis; Foil and Sabre: A Grammar of Fencing in Detailed Lessons for Professor and Pupil; [fencing manual]; Estes and Lauriat, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America; 1892.

Rossi, Giordano; Theoretical-Practical Manual for Sword and Sabre Fencing; translation by Sebastian Seager; [fencing manual];  Milan, Italy, translated edition by the Melbourne Fencing Society, Carnegie, Victoria, Australia; 1885, translation 2021. 


Sanz, Adelardo [translation by John Jakelsky]; Saber Fencing and Considerations About the Duel; [fencing manual]; first published in Spanish by Imprenta de Fortanet, Madrid, Spain; 1886; translated edition published by John Jakelsky, Xativa, Valencia, Spain; 2020.

van Humbeek, Leopold J. M. P.; Manual for Fencing with the Sabre; translation by Reinier van Nort; [fencing manual]; Amsterdam, Netherlands; translated and reprinted by Reinier van Noort, Hagan, Norway; 1905 reprinted 2017.

Copyright 2021 by Walter G. Green III

Creative Commons License

Balance Point of the Blade by Walter G. Green III is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Saturday, December 04, 2021

W.2. Additions to the Number of Sections of the Blade

In post W.1. (June 2019) we discussed how the blade was subdivided in classical fencing into sections that had significance for the fencer's technique in both offense and defense.  As is common in research, further work on this topic and access to new sources has increased what we know, and therefore this serves as an addition to the previous work.

Our previous examination of divisions included 2 equal divisions, 2 unequal divisions, and 3 divisions.   This post addresses 4 or more divisions although we will note one variant to the 3 division approach.

  • Luigi Barbasetti (1932) divides the blade into three sections: the Point, foible, and forte.  Few of the texts consulted specifically mentioned the point as a distinct part of the blade, and Barbasetti does not indicate the length of the point, which would seem to be just the very outer portion of the blade, the nail head and the immediate supporting blade.

The German school of thrust fencing describes the blade as having 4 sections:

  • Johann Wilhelm Roux (1808) identifies the four equal sections as (from the guard toward he point) as Full Strong, Half Strong, Half Weak, and Full Weak.
  • Friedrich Augustus Wilhelm Ludwig Roux (1849) makes a minor change in the names of the sections (although this may be simply a difference between two translations) to Total Strong, Half Strength, Half Weak, and Total Weak.
These two sources fall before the classical period but their content was applied well into the classical period.

We have encountered one description of a division of the blade into 5 sections:
  • Giordano Rossi, in his 1885 update to Radaellian School, divides the blade into 5 equal  sections (from the guard to the point) as Double Strong, Strong, Middle, Weak, and Double Weak. 

Finally, we have 8 sections: 

  • Giuseppe Rosaroll Scorza and Pietro Grissetti's 1803 volume, a very well-regarded text which informed classical period fencing in Italy, includes an 8 section division of the blade.  This starts with an initial division of the blade into two halves, separated at the center.  From the guard the progression is defined by degree points at Double Strong (1), Strong (2), Less Strong (3), Center (4), Less Weak (5), Weak (6), Double Weak (7), and Point (8).  The difference between the degree points of the fencer and the opponent predicts the relative strength of each blade, although stopping to do the calculation in a bout might not be the best use of your time. 

Sources:

Barbasetti, Luigi; The Art of the Foil; [fencing manual]; E. P. Dutton and Company, Inc., New York, New York, United States of America; 1932.


Roux, Johann Wilhelm; Manual for the Art of Fencing According to Mathematical and Physical Principles; translation by Tobias Zimmerman; [fencing manual]; Academic Bookstore’s Publishing, Jena, Gotha, Germany; 1808.

Roux, Friedrich August Wilhelm Ludwig; Die Kreussler'sche Stossfechtschule for Use by Academies and Military Schools Based on a Mathematical Basis; translation by Christopher Treichel; [fencing manual]; Druck and Verlag von Friedrich Mauke, Jena, Saxe-Weimar-Eisenach, Germany; 1849; reprinted by Christopher Treichel; 2016.

Rossi, Giordano; Theoretical-Practical Manual for Sword and Sabre Fencing; translation by Sebastian Seager; [fencing manual];  Milan, Italy, translated edition by the Melbourne Fencing Society, Carnegie, Victoria, Australia; 1885, translation 2021. 

Scorza, Giuseppe Rosaroll, and Pietro Grisetti; The Science of Fencing; translation by Christopher Holzman; [fencing manual]; Milano, Italy; 1803; reprinted by Christopher Holzman, Wichita, Kansas, United States of America; 2018.

Copyright 2021 by Walter G. Green III

Creative Commons License

Additions to the Number of Sections of the Blade by Walter G. Green III is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Thursday, December 02, 2021

C.7. Stonehenge and Wood's Foil Curriculum

In 1863 "Stonehenge" (a pseudonym) and the Reverend J. G. Wood published a short introductory manual that included fencing, the broadsword, and archery, one of a series of such books found in the late 1800s and early 1900s that addressed a number of sports or pastimes.  The curriculum they describe is for the foil and is a simple one at approximately the intermediate level.  We include this in our technical blog because this book is not a specialist text, but rather is the sort of general interest text that could survive and inform amateur trainers well into the classical period.

In 1884 a short introductory manual that included chapters on "How to Fence," "Broadsword Exercise," "Archery," "Hurdle Racing," "Vaulting with the Pole, or Pole-Leaping," "Throwing the Hammer," and "Putting the Shot" was published.  This volume is attributed to Aaron A. Warford, the author of a number of how-to books.  Warford's fencing chapter is identical in text and illustrations to Stonehenge and Wood's.  

In other words, Warford appears to have plagiarized Stonehenge and Wood's work.   This was not uncommon at that time - modern concepts of intellectuial property were not well developed.  At this point we cannot be sure that Stonehenge and Wood had not lifted some of their text from another, earlier source.  Lawson suggests that at least the broadsword material was not original.  The unintended consequence was that this curriculum certainly survived into the classical period.

The Stonehenge and Wood curriculum consists of the following elements:

(1)  The Guard

  • (1a)  First Position
  • (1b)  Second Position

(2)  Footwork

  • (2a)  Advance
  • (2b)  Retreat
  • (2c)  Lunge
  • (2d) Recover

(3)  Engagement

  • (3a)  Inside Engagement
  • (3b)  Outside Engagement

(4)  The Parades (Parries)

  • (4a)  Simple Parries

  1. (4a1)  Prime
  2. (4a2)  Quarte
  3. (4a3)  Tierce
  4. (4a4)  Quarte over the Arm
  5. (4a5)  Seconde
  6. (4a6)  Demi-Circle

  • (4b)  Contre-Parades

  1. (4b1)  Contre de Quarte
  2. (4b2)  Contre de Tierce
  3. (4b3)  Contre de Seconde
  4. (4b4)  Contre de Cercle

(5)  Attacks

  • (5a)  Simple Attacks (all can be parried by one or more simple parries)

  1. (5a1)  Straight Thrust
  2. (5a2)  Disengagement
  3. (5a3)  One-Two
  4. (5a4)  Beat and Thrust
  5. (5a5)  Beat and Disengagement
  6. (5a6)  Cut Over the Point
  7. (5a7)  Cut Over and Disengagement

  • (5b)  Double

(6)  Feints

(7)  The Assault

Sources:

"Stonehenge" and Wood, J. G.; Archery, Fencing, and Broadsword; [multiple sports manual]; Routledge, Warne, and Routledge, London, United Kingdom, reprint by Kirk Lawson, unknown place; 1863, reprint unknown date.

Warford, Aaron A.; How To Fence; [multiple sports manual]; Frank Tousey, Publisher, New York, New York, United States of America; 1884.

Copyright 2021 by Walter G. Green III.

Creative Commons License

Stonehenge and Wood's Foil Curriculum by Walter G. Green III is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.